[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]

To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:11:11 +0900
Cc: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3FD59802.AAF3FA47@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <637CEC9E-2994-11D8-9318-000A9598A184@kurtis.pp.se> <3FD59802.AAF3FA47@zurich.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Brian;

But in practical terms it *does* matter whether we are talking about multihoming affecting one physical interface, a set of interfaces on one machine, a set of interfaces on a cluster of machines, or something else.

It does NOT matter.

Physical interface is not a meaningful entity.

As I and Iljitsch discussed, a cluster of machines virtually acting
as a single host can be treated as a single host.

Masataka Ohta

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>

References:
- Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: additional attack for multi6 threat draft?
Next by Date: Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
Previous by thread: Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
Next by thread: Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread