Re: draft-savola-multi6-asn-pi-01.txt

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-02-20, at 17.57, marcelo bagnulo wrote:

> I guess that first we should agree that really big sites won't use
> multiaddressing and that they should obtain their own PI block.
> Then we need to define the criteria to identify big sites
> A finally then decide which addresses we should give them
>
> IMHO, the first decision concerns the IETF
> I am not so sure about the second and the third point, perhaps this 
> should
> concern the rirs, more than the ietf?

Agreed. We could make our lives very easy and just say that the current 
filtering policy is up to the RIRs to handle. By that giving them also 
one of the other keys to the multihoming problem - just break 
aggregation. IMHO this is where we are today. But as most sites 
actually do filter on allocation boundaries, we don't have an issue.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQDjT7aarNKXTPFCVEQLUFQCdF73pxE7Hhq8DnQkLPRCzCEUA/sEAoJwP
7GxHJaJ/7PG8fAmDbVfL4zsd
=koQv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----