Re: DRAFT of the architecture presentation for the WG session this week

[Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>]

The use of specific proposals is as examples in the context of the 
presentation,
as they are intended to be examples of the various styles of approach.
This was to constrain the length of time for the presentation as a more
exhaustive enumeration in the presentation would not really add an
awful lot to the taxonomy but would take a lot of time.

As I understand the overall plan the to-be-written-document would attempt
to analyse all the proposals using this architectural taxonomy,


regards,

   Geoff


At 06:53 PM 2/03/2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 2-mrt-04, at 2:32, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> > In the interests of allowing everyone to come armed with the appropriate 
> > weapons for this agenda topic, I've attached a PDF of the current version 
> > of the draft.
>
> Geoff, is there any reason my two recent drafts 
> (draft-van-beijnum-multi6-odt-00.txt and 
> draft-van-beijnum-multi6-cbhi-00.txt, which isn't on Kurtis' list) aren't 
> included in your analysis?