Re: how secure mh should be? Re: identifiers and security

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-07-01, at 11.46, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> imho is important to reach a common criteria here.
>
> i think that the minimum goal should be that the resulting solution 
> should be as secure as current fixed, single homed IPv6 internet.
>
> As you say, i wouldn't mind if the result is a bit more secure, but i 
> wouldn't require it

I've been struggling not to say that maybe we should. But that is more 
of a layer9/mgmt issue as we then would require to define "how much" 
better. But I think that every improvement is a big advantage.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQOT+6KarNKXTPFCVEQJN8gCgtB1f0kqtxJy6lDYH/VZFKQV59HAAnRrA
5ConZSi9xDB6WiEAsUu1/A+Z
=6HL3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----