[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is UML an option for the IETF?
- To: NIM List <nim@psg.com>
- Subject: Is UML an option for the IETF?
- From: "Avri Doria" <avri@nortelnetworks.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 09:16:50 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 06:20:51 -0700
- Envelope-to: nim-data@psg.com
- Organization: Nortel Networks - Routing Architecture Lab
Hi,
In regard to Tom's suggestion that UML be used to describe the
model:
Is it possible to use UML without graphics support? And if not,
can we justifiably use it as the IETF method of description.
Personally, I am getting comfortable with UML when using UML drawing
packages (e.g. Rose). But I find it very uncomfortable to use with
ascii characters. As far as I can tell UML is totally implementation
dependent; i.e. if you can't draw it, you can't express it.
Is there a way around this problem? Other by writing a graphic UML
to ascii character drawing converter for each UML graphics program?
a.
--
Avri Doria
+1 401 663 5024