[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:20:26AM -0400, George Jones <gmj@pobox.com> stated:
>On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Budd, Fred wrote:
>
>> Where I was really heading was expanding the proposed requirement to
>> include the explicit definition of local (e.g. directly attached
>> subnet) and remote, and corresponding functional behavior for inline
>> and remote access.
>
>Good thinking.  That is a useful.
>
>Looks like the breakdown:
>
>  Local/Remote
>  Inband/OoB

So it would look like:
Local/OoB - Console, Keyboard + Monitor style
Remote/OoB - Console via serial port
Local inband - From the interface, must be within one hop
Remote inband - Over TCP, ICMP, or what have you.

Does that match up with what people's notions are?

Todd