Re: Proposed alternate milestones (Re: Straw-man charter)

[George Jones <gmj@pobox.com>]

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Ross Callon wrote:

> Some thoughts:
> 	- abbreviate the milestones regarding charter discussions etc to
> 	  a simple "first working group meeting in San Diego"

OK.

> 	- mention NANOG in the discussion under "methods", but leave
> 	  it out of the milestones

OK.  Also omitting names of groups (NANOG, RIPE).
> 	- Rate limiting draft is folded into Filtering draft

OK.

> 	- Drafts need to be listed separately in the milestones

Do we need a list of drafts-to-be-written apart from the schedule ?


> 	- IP Stack requirements will be folded into the "other" or Miscellaneous
> reqts>
>	  document (since otherwise it would be only a few pages) (or maybe it could
> 	  be combined with a different document?)

OK.   I've also combined documentation and assurance and moved them
late in the schedule as they are both short now.

> This leads to the following rough estimate at Goals and Milestones:

OK...with changes notes above.

Thanks,
---George Jones