[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed alternate milestones (Re: Straw-man charter)
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, David Kessens wrote:
> Also, do you really want to list that 'it may be appropriate to
> broaden the scope' ? This is fairly vague language. Either it is in
> scope, or it is out of scope.
There have been people interested in doing SOHO and Wireless reqs
of the same nature. I don't think it's too much to expect that
once this WG finishes something appropriate to NSP, ISP and Enterprise
networks that there would be follow on work in these areas. This
sentence was there to anticipate questions about other areas of work.
After seeing Ross' proposed time-line, I think it may be well for
people interested in other classes of devices to proceed in
parallel if they are interested. I'll take the sentence out.
Thanks,
---George Jones