Re: Proposed alternate milestones (Re: Straw-man charter)

[Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>]

At 11:41 AM 6/5/2004 -0700, David Kessens wrote:
> >       - mention NANOG in the discussion under "methods", but leave
> >         it out of the milestones
>
> a small nitpick:
> please be careful to talk about 'operator forums' in general,
> IETF listens to input from operators across the globe.

Good point. The IETF is a global group. Nanog is a North American
group.

Does this squash the idea of having meetings at operators forums? It
would seem impractical to have meetings at operators forums in each
of North America, Asia, and Europe, and even this would be missing
some other operator's forums.

We certainly could have individuals give talks at each of multiple
forums in order to get the word out regarding what we are doing.

Should we simply mention the desire to coordinate with operator's
forums in the charter (without mentioning any specific forum), and then
have a discussion in the working group regarding what this means and
whether it means picking out a particular group for an interim meeting?

thanks, Ross