Re: Proposed alternate milestones (Re: Straw-man charter)

[David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>]

Ross, George,

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:33:32PM -0400, Ross Callon wrote:
> Some thoughts:
> 	- abbreviate the milestones regarding charter discussions etc to
> 	  a simple "first working group meeting in San Diego"

Yes, no need to mention the working group meetings.
You can list the milestones with intended status and date of
submisssion or first publication.

> 	- mention NANOG in the discussion under "methods", but leave
> 	  it out of the milestones

a small nitpick:
please be careful to talk about 'operator forums' in general,
IETF listens to input from operators across the globe.

Also, do you really want to list that 'it may be appropriate to
broaden the scope' ? This is fairly vague language. Either it is in
scope, or it is out of scope. 

David Kessens
---