[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft)

To: john.loughney@nokia.com
Subject: Re: subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft)
From: Nagi <Nagi_Reddy.Jonnala@alcatel.be>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:16:10 +0100
Cc: wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Organization: Alcatel Telecom
References: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB3206360143B66C@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>

Hi John,


>  My company has implemented both, including some VSAs & we're concerned
> about extensions that
> would cause us to implement more stuff without a clear benefit for doing
> so.

Having a standard type doesn't necessarily mean to implement that. Right? A
particular functionality like prepaid may not be supported by a box and still
it can be a standard type.

Nagi.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft)
  - From: <john.loughney@nokia.com>

Prev by Date: AW: subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Ste rman draft)
Next by Date: RE: subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft)
Previous by thread: subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft)
Next by thread: RE: subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread