RE: subtypes (was: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft)

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Hi Nagi,

> >  My company has implemented both, including some VSAs & we're concerned
> > about extensions that
> > would cause us to implement more stuff without a clear benefit for doing
> > so.
> 
> Having a standard type doesn't necessarily mean to implement that. Right? A
> particular functionality like prepaid may not be supported by a box and still
> it can be a standard type.

My meta-point is really that if we are going to extend RADIUS, we should try
to extend RADIUS in such a way that doesn't break interoperability.  Additionally,
we need to sort out what are the extensions that are really needed.  I personally
don't have a sense of that yet.

John

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>