Re: RADEXT charter for comment...

[Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:39:09AM -0800, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> 
> A 16-bit Vendor type field might make more sense; this is large enough
> that one might even be able to squeeze in a 'M'andatory bit, and a bit
> reserved for future use, as follows:

I'm confused.  As someone who might conceivably be paid to extend
RADIUS software I ought to applaud, but I thought there was a
prohibition on requiring software update.  Did I miss something?

-- 
Barney Wolff         http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>