RE: RADEXT charter for comment...

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

I agree that this should be done as seperate documents and I dont mind
working on them.

A question though, can someone please demonstrate a need for this work?

And finally, wouldnt NASREQ automatically handle the WLAN RADIUS attributes?

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernard Aboba
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Sent: 3/12/04 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: RADEXT charter for comment...

> I assume this covers the request from the GSMA about the WLAN roaming.
> Do you think this can be covered in the same document as the other
> LAN attributes?  There were several aspects about WLAN roaming,
> and I am not sure that these all could be handled in one document.

We could have a separate document for WLAN and LAN.

> Also, on this topic, it seems that this would have quite a bit of
relevance
> to Diameter as well, so I would like to propose that we would consider
> the impact of WLAN roaming in both RADIUS & Diameter in a single
document.

In the interest of focus, I think it would be ok to have a separate
Diameter document.  Is there a volunteer to write that document?

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>