[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rfc2486bis
stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be wrote:
In RFC2486, I see
realm = realm "." label
Yes. Unfortunately, this rule has infinite
recursion, which is why there needs to be
some change. Not sure the current change
is right, but something has to be done.
and in 2486bis, I read
realm = [ realm "." ] ilabel
Now I was thinking that originaly, there must be an "." in the realm
but in 2486bis, it is made optional making "foo" a valid realm. The
addition of the square brackets in 2486bis triggered my question.
Should it be
realm = 1*( realm "." ) ilabel
Sounds better, thanks!
--Jari
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>