RE: AAAEXT charter, Take 1

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Questions:

Is the scope of work going to remain the same?

If not, how do limited resources get mapped between RADIUS/Diameter?

Concerns:

Will the combining of the WGs further delay RADIUS EXT WG.  If yes then I
would vote for not combining the groups.  If however, the effect is to
somehow accelerate the WG and work items then I would support this effort.

Avi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba@internaut.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:52 AM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: AAAEXT charter, Take 1
> 
> 
> > For what its worth, I agree with Jari's suggested modified 
> charter. I 
> > have more interest in the converged view of supporting both 
> RADIUS & 
> > Diameter, so I'm motivated by Jari's charter to be involved.
> 
> How do other participants feel about a "AAAEXT" charter?
> Should we rename the potential WG and re-orient towards 
> handling both RADIUS and Diameter in a single WG?
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>