CUI: WG Work Item

[<jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com>]

Bernard, 

I also think CUI is suitable for a WG item. Currently, the concept of
CUI has been adopted
by several well established roaming organizations and also it has
already been experimented among
number of operators. Thus there seems to be real need for it in various
roaming scenarios where
existing mechanisms were not considered to be sufficient. Should there
be open issues or shortcomings
in the latest Draft those could be resolved within this WG.

Br,
	Jouni

-- 
Jouni Korhonen - Senior Researcher
Emerging Technologies and Innovations
TeliaSonera Finland

>
> Over the last month, there has been considerable discussion of the
> Chargeable User Identity document.
>
> Given the considerable amount of discussion, it would appear that WG
> participants have had sufficient time to determine whether this
document
> is suitable for becoming a RADEXT WG work item:
>
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-chargeable-user
-identity-02.txt
>
> Therefore, we are going to call for Consensus on whether the document
is
> suitable for becoming a WG work item.
>
> If you believe that the document is suitable please send mail with
"CUI:
> WG Work Item" in the subject, detailing why you think the draft is
> suitable for  becoming a RADEXT WG Work item.
>
> If you believe that there are major problems with the draft or that
the
> draft is unnecessary, please send mail with "CUI: unsuitable" in the
> subject line, and in the body explain your objections.
>
> Thank you!



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>