[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Issue 16] Special Characters in RFC 2486bis-01

To: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Subject: Re: [Issue 16] Special Characters in RFC 2486bis-01
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:02:45 +0200
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0411031943240.14852@internaut.com>
Organization: None
References: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0411031943240.14852@internaut.com>
Reply-to: jari.arkko@piuha.net
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316

Bernard Aboba wrote:

In RFC 2486, "jari.arkko@ericsson.com" is a valid NAI, and it would appear
that this is also true in RFC 2486bis, due to the following rules:

username = dot-string
dot-string = string
dot-string =/ dot-string "." string

Or am I missing something?


No -- you are not missing anything. My mistake on reading
the ABNF. Sorry! But the ABNF is correct.

At a minimum, I think we may need additional examples of legal and illegal
NAIs.


Hmm... I'm not completely sure about that. But I see that you
have some nits e-mail about the document too, so if I have to
submit a new one anyway I could add a firstname.lastname example.
We already have legal/illegal special character examples.

--Jari


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- Re: [Issue 16] Special Characters in RFC 2486bis-01
  - From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>

Prev by Date: CUI: WG Work Item
Next by Date: Re: [Issue 15] Editorial NITs with RFC 2486bis-01
Previous by thread: Re: [Issue 16] Special Characters in RFC 2486bis-01
Next by thread: [Issue 15] Editorial NITs with RFC 2486bis-01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread