Re: [Issue 15] Editorial NITs with RFC 2486bis-01

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

Hi Bernard,

Thanks for the nits check. Inline:

> Section 1.1:  You need an extra line space between definitions.

Yes. XML2RFC changed in this respect a number of revisions ago.
I have now put in the extra lines.

> Change: "ISP- provided" to "ISP-provided"

Ok.

> Section 3, 4 and 5 probably do not require a page break (e.g. can start in
> the middle of the page).

Ok. Hmm... I don't seem to be able to control XML2RFC well enough
prevent this from happening. I'll leave it to the RFC Editor.

> There is no reference to [8] in the document (RFC 2486).

The reference has been added to parts that discuss RFC 2486.

> BTW, what is the status of the SASLPrep document?
>
> The reference is normative, meaning that RFC 2486bis can't be published
> until it is resolved.

I think it is already an RFC. Checking... no, but its in
the RFC Editor's queue. So no problem.

--Jari


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>