RE: Progress on RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Yes it would be the keywrap. 

So I would prefer to do it right but as time constraints have it.... 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, David [mailto:dnelson@enterasys.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:28 PM
> To: Avi Lior; Bernard Aboba; Glen Zorn (gwz)
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org; AC Mahendran
> Subject: RE: Progress on RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication
> 
> 
> > Okay. So lets get this draft into last call right away.
> 
> Which draft?  The keywrap draft?  We haven't reached 
> consensus that it should be a WG work item yet, although 
> Bernard has suggested that it should be, and it seems to 
> address a valid issue (NIST/FIPS approved algorithms).
> 
> Perhaps we ought to follow your earlier suggestion and use 
> the existing Message-Authenticator Attribute in the Digest 
> Authentication draft (as it is a short-term dependency for 
> 3GPP2).  We could then let the keywrap draft take its course, 
> hopefully eliciting more review and comment on the list than 
> heretofore.
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>