Re: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility

[Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>]

>   No, and no. RFC3394 is a _use of_ AES. A specific use. It's to solve the
> problem of transmitting keying material over an untrusted network. And
> that is _exactly_ the problem the keywrap draft is solving.
>
>   One thing the IETF does well (in addition to apparently referencing
> existing crypto) is take work from outside the IETF and document it in
> RFCs. TLS is a perfect example. So is RFC3394. Neither one is "roll your
> own" and neither is a proposal to use one of them.
>
>   Dan.
>
>
>   

Yes I was unclear in my comment, sorry.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>