RE: Revisions to RFC 4005 (was RE: Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt)

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

>   Current uses already involve getting RADIUS VSA's in non-RFC formats
>into Diameter packets.  Whether we like to admit it or not, the practice
>already seems to be following David Mitton's draft:
>
>http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-mitton-diameter-radius-vsas-01.txt

Since the "extended attributes" document will need to deal with VSA formats 
(and Diameter translation of same), 
[gwz] 
[gwz] 
I'm not sure why?

>perhaps this can be tackled there?



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>