[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Revisions to RFC 4005 (was RE: Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt)



Since the "extended attributes" document will need to deal with VSA formats
(and Diameter translation of same),

[gwz] I'm not sure why?

Because the extended attribute draft uses Attribute 26, but with a vendor code of 0, which currently isn't supported by RFC 4005?



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>