RE: Revisions to RFC 4005

["David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>]

Glen Zorn writes...

> > Since the "extended attributes" document will need to deal with
> > VSA formats (and Diameter translation of same),...
>
> I'm not sure why?

I agree that the issue of transparency of VSAs in RADIUS and Diameter is not
strictly related to Extended RADIUS Attributes.  Ideally, this would be
addressed in an rfc4005bis draft.  One does not exist, however.  So, the
question is what's the next best fit?



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>