|
I think that it might be a better idea instead of using the
(already assigned to IANA, as David has pointed out) Vendor-Id of zero (0) for
the radext extended attributes to instead request a separate Vendor-Id for the
radext WG & encourage other WGs that need new attributes to do the
same. For example, the hokey WG is likely to need at least one new RADIUS
attribute, so it would get its own ID (& therefore its own namespace).
This has the advantage of expanding the standard attribute space by leaps
rather than baby steps ;-) & provides a fairly automatic & orderly
method of namespace management. Thoughts? |