Re: Vendor-Id for radext extended attributes

[Alan DeKok <aland@nitros9.org>]

Glen Zorn wrote:
> I think that it might be a better idea instead of using the (already
> assigned to IANA, as David has pointed out) Vendor-Id of zero (0)  for
> the radext extended attributes to instead request a separate Vendor-Id
> for the radext WG & encourage other WGs that need new attributes to do
> the same.

  Yes.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>