Suggested text: SDOs are encouraged to submit their RADIUS specifications to the IETF for publication as an informational RFC. Vendors defining Vendor- Specific dictionaries for their own use SHOULD make their specification publicly available, but there is no need to publish their specification as an RFC. i.e. IANA should do nothing in either case.
I think that the issue of IANA assignment could be addressed more explicitly. How about this?
"SDOs are encouraged to seek review of VSA specifications by the IETF, and once reviewed, to publish them as Informational RFCs, rather than requesting IANA allocations within the standard RADIUS attribute space. Vendors wishing to make their specifications publicly available should also request publication of their VSA specifications as Informational RFCs by the IETF, rather than requesting IANA allocations for proprietary attributes."
-- to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>