RE: Guidelines suggested text for checklist:

["David B. Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>]

Alan DeKok writes...

>   Suggested text:
> 
>    SDOs are encouraged to submit their RADIUS specifications to the IETF
>    for publication as an informational RFC.  Vendors defining Vendor-
>    Specific dictionaries for their own use SHOULD make their
>    specification publicly available, but there is no need to publish
>    their specification as an RFC.

I think that text is fine.  It doesn't address the decision to undertake the
work in the IETF or in another SDO, but that is really outside the scope of
this document.

However, please see my recent posting about the "beefing up" the distinction
between requirements for Standard Attributes and Vendor Specific Attributes,
when the VSAs are to expected to exhibit for multi-vendor interoperability.
I would always expect that to be case whether the work is done in the IETF
or in another SDO.




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>