Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

This document is 36 pages long, yet devotes only a single paragraph to the
use of extended RADIUS attributes.  Since the extended attribute set is
likely the one to be most used in the future, this seems a rather gross
oversight.  I would suggest that the authors try to design a few extended
attribute sets and then document that experience.  I mention this at this
late date because I expected this note to become an RFC long before the
extended attributes doc, but (FWIW) the latter has completed WG "Last"
Call...


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>