[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunnelling & GigE jumbo frame size
YES!
I've come to believe that one of the fundamental failures of the IETF
is that it permits or even encourages protocol design to be directed
by corner cases. This results in a rat's nest of often conflicting
requirements and unimplementable complexity. There is no perfect
solution and there will be tradeoffs any direction you choose.
TANSTAAFL. Really.
Start simple and evolve to meet the changing environment. If I have
one complaint about LISP, it is that it may already be too complicated.
Regards,
-drc
On Sep 12, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
Where is this assumption coming from? As long as there are FastE
links,
this is not going to happen.
Listen folks, one solution isn't going to solve all of the world's
problems. Want to throw away this effort because of this one issue?
You think another solution won't have issues as well?
We design for the optimal case and hopefully with experience and
data from operators more networks move to the optimal case. And
later if we have to still solve the suboptimal case, we do
fragmentation.
Can we agree with this?
Dino
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg