RE: [RRG] loc/id split and LISP

[jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)]

    > From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>

    > It should be what benefit LISP can bring us.

I agree. Nothing will succeed unless it brings an economic benefit.

    > Of course, LISP could introduce another namespace in order to be a real
    > identifier/locator split solution ... but that would be too expensive
    > to be deployed. 

Why do you feel that way? Is it because it would increase the cost of
deployment if we couldn't re-use IPv4 routers inside the LISP 'core', if we
designed a new namespace?

	Noel


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg