|
In einer eMail vom 08.10.2007 15:08:49 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt
jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu:
>
From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
> It
should be what benefit LISP can bring us.
I agree. Nothing will succeed
unless it brings an economic benefit.
> Of course,
LISP could introduce another namespace in order to be a real
> identifier/locator split solution ... but that would be too
expensive
> to be deployed.
Why do you feel that
way? Is it because it would increase the cost of
deployment if we couldn't
re-use IPv4 routers inside the LISP 'core', if we
designed a new
namespace?
Noel
When I mentioned all the advantages of my hierarchical model (that one
which was rated POOR) I forgot to mention that it does not need another
namespace.
Heiner
|