Re: [RRG] Process proposal: agenda admission control

[dimitri papadimitriou <dpapadimitriou@psg.com>]

hi,


just curious, you state:


"only high quality proposals with substantive novelty will take 
group-wide time."

-> novelty against ? the existing global Internet, the existing 
scientific literature, the existing rrg proposals, etc. ?


"The identity of the endorsing member will be made public."

-> is the review itself also going to be made public/sent on the list ?


"If any member of the committee feels that the presentation is 
worthwhile, it will be placed on the agenda, time permitting."

-> meaning that one member agreement is sufficient (i guess so because 
you are referring to singular afterwards)


note: if a proposal comes that tries to improve an existing proposal are 
these also considered as "new" proposals ?


thanks,
-d.

Tony Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we all agree, RRG meeting time is our most limited resource, and 
> perhaps also the most effective means to facilitate our convergence 
> process. Thus, we would like to allocate adequate amount of time for 
> discussions in our future meetings.  Consequently, we need to be more 
> selective on the presentations of new proposals.  We would like to 
> reiterate that the floor remains open for new proposals, so new 
> proposals may still be submitted as a draft and considered on the 
> mailing list.  However, we would like to ensure that only high quality 
> proposals with substantive novelty will take group-wide time.
>
> To assist us in this, the chairs plan to form a "program committee".  
> These would be interested members who are respected architectural 
> contributors.  For a proposal to be considered for an agenda slot, the 
> backers of the proposal should approach members of this committee and 
> ask them to review their proposal.  Committee members that have a 
> conflict of interest (e.g., same employer) should recuse themselves.  If 
> any member of the committee feels that the presentation is worthwhile, 
> it will be placed on the agenda, time permitting.  The identity of the 
> endorsing member will be made public.
>
> We would deeply appreciate your comments on this proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Lixia & Tony
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
>
> .

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg