[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Process proposal: agenda admission control




Hi Dimitri,

"only high quality proposals with substantive novelty will take group-wide time."

-> novelty against ? the existing global Internet, the existing scientific literature, the existing rrg proposals, etc. ?


Against the existing proposals.


"The identity of the endorsing member will be made public."

-> is the review itself also going to be made public/sent on the list ?


The review is essentially a yes/no answer and we'll only be disclosing the yeses.


"If any member of the committee feels that the presentation is worthwhile, it will be placed on the agenda, time permitting."

-> meaning that one member agreement is sufficient (i guess so because you are referring to singular afterwards)


Correct.


note: if a proposal comes that tries to improve an existing proposal are these also considered as "new" proposals ?


Yes, we would want to treat a variant of an existing proposal as a new proposal.

Tony

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg