Hi Dimitri,
"only high quality proposals with substantive novelty will take group-wide time."-> novelty against ? the existing global Internet, the existing scientific literature, the existing rrg proposals, etc. ?
Against the existing proposals.
"The identity of the endorsing member will be made public."-> is the review itself also going to be made public/sent on the list ?
The review is essentially a yes/no answer and we'll only be disclosing the yeses.
"If any member of the committee feels that the presentation is worthwhile, it will be placed on the agenda, time permitting."-> meaning that one member agreement is sufficient (i guess so because you are referring to singular afterwards)
Correct.
note: if a proposal comes that tries to improve an existing proposal are these also considered as "new" proposals ?
Yes, we would want to treat a variant of an existing proposal as a new proposal.
Tony -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg