[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Process proposal: agenda admission control
Ok, I agree that publicly known for supporting the proposal could be a way
to guarantee the reputation.
-Hui
2007/12/13, Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>:
>
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Hui Deng wrote:
>
> > Neutral background would be necessary for one eligible for this
> > committee.
>
>
> Please note that we specifically did not require this. It's very
> difficult to ascertain if someone is truly neutral and also ensure
> that they actually behave that way even if they say that they are.
> To avoid undue bias, we specifically want the supporting committee
> member to publicly known for supporting the proposal. If the
> proposal is indeed unworthy, this would reflect badly on the
> committee member. Hopefully this would act as a deterrent to
> insufficient selectivity or conflict of interest.
>
> Tony
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg