[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] LISP-NERD reachability and MTU detection
How does it remain a corner case if we make a map-and-encap
solution the cornerstone of all future Internet routing and we
want to continue to support bulk transfers? It would
When the end-to-end path is 4470 bytes, than fairly large transfer
can be done.
You can do fairly large transfers one bit at a time... That's not
the issue.
That is not at all what Tony and I meant.
If your ITR has a 4470 byte uplink and your ETR has a 4470 byte
downlink and there's nothing smaller in the path between them, there
aren't going to be any problems. In an ISP
Right.
network it should be possible to meet these three conditions if we
can get the slower brethren and internet exchanges to upgrade. But
if we want to deploy xTRs in end-user controlled networks, the 1500+
byte MTU requirement won't be easy to meet.a
There is more and more Ethernet being deployed.
Dino
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg