[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] getting rid of longest match
On 25 feb 2008, at 23:43, Scott Brim wrote:
What I'm thinking is that for any given part of the address space,
there would be a fixed prefix length. So for 192.0.0.0/8 /24, for
64.0.0.0/8 /20, for 17.0.0.0/8 /8... So in theory, there would be
no overlap. There could still be if the filters weren't set up
properly, which would probably have to resolved when translating
the RIB into the FIB.
Isn't this just what we did pre-CIDR?
Yes, except that it wouldn't be hardcoded into the IP stack but
enforced through filters. So it could be /24 for 193.0.0.0/9 and /19
for 193.128.0.0/9.
The issue with overlap is: which one do you choose? Longest match says
the smallest block is the good one, but I don't think YouTube
appreciated that logic yesterday. If we ditch longest match we need
another rule. Allowing only one prefix size for a certain address
range is one way to resolve this, but others are also possible. For
instance, S-BGP or soBGP-like security mechanisms.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg