Alright. I guess a priority field in MAP records would do the job. It would allow MAP records to be reordered arbitrarily without losing priority information.Should you do so, remember that RFC 2782 already specifies such a mechanism so it could be a better idea to build on it, specially since it is already implemented in resolvers (for instance the RULI library).
Yep, point taken. - Christian -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg