re: [RRG] Consensus check: mapping granularity

[Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>]

> > The identifier to locator mapping function should support mapping
entries
> > for both host identifiers and their aggregates.
> 
> For scalability reasons, I would propose to define this requirement as
> follows :
> 
> The identifier to locator mapping function MUST support mapping entries
> for aggregates of identifiers. It MAY also support mapping entries for
> host identifiers.

Hi Tony and Olivier,

Does this requirement imply that the identifier must be a hierarchical label
(not flat label) so as to be aggregatable?

Best wishes,
Xiaohu XU




--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg