[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Consensus check: mapping granularity



On 3/20/08 12:19 AM, Tony Li allegedly wrote:
Hi all,

So after opening the discussion on this subject, the silence has been
deafening.  Therefore, I assume that we're all in agreement.  ;-)

Specifically, do we agree that:

The identifier to locator mapping function should support mapping entries
for both host identifiers and their aggregates.

"should" ... are you trying to say that it should *support* this but not necessarily do well at it, or that it should support it at the same level of scalability as coarser aggregates, or ?

I wouldn't mind just "allow". Beyond that has serious implications that have to be thought through.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg