On 3/20/08 12:19 AM, Tony Li allegedly wrote:
Hi all, So after opening the discussion on this subject, the silence has been deafening. Therefore, I assume that we're all in agreement. ;-) Specifically, do we agree that: The identifier to locator mapping function should support mapping entries for both host identifiers and their aggregates.
"should" ... are you trying to say that it should *support* this but not necessarily do well at it, or that it should support it at the same level of scalability as coarser aggregates, or ?
I wouldn't mind just "allow". Beyond that has serious implications that have to be thought through.
-- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg