[RRG] Consensus check: mapping granularity

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

Hi all,

So after opening the discussion on this subject, the silence has been
deafening.  Therefore, I assume that we're all in agreement.  ;-)

Specifically, do we agree that:

The identifier to locator mapping function should support mapping entries
for both host identifiers and their aggregates.

Any dissent?

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg