RE: [RRG] on draft-meyer-lisp-eid-block-00.txt

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>]

Note - so that this is not misconstrued as an unqualified
endorsement, I still believe LISP has to tackle a number
of issues including the tunnel MTU situation, per my
message on 3/9/08:

  http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/rrg/2008/msg00692.html

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Templin, Fred L 
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:52 AM
>To: Routing Research Group Mailing List
>Cc: Christian Vogt; Darrel Lewis (darlewis); dmm@cisco.com; 
>Vince Fuller
>Subject: [RRG] on draft-meyer-lisp-eid-block-00.txt
>
>This draft follows from the comments I made at the mike
>during Christian Vogt's presentation on 3/14 and also
>here on the list:
>
>http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/rrg/2008/msg00780.html
>http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/rrg/2008/msg00781.html
>
>The idea is that if a sufficiently large IPv6 prefix
>is reserved for use as EID space, then a simple
>transition is possible since it can be known whether
>an EID resides behind an ETR simply by examining the
>prefix. (Plus, the legacy IPv6 deployments never have
>to renumber.)
>
>My comment to the draft authors is that the request
>for a /16 may be overly conservative; why not ask for
>something more like a /8, /10, etc. (or even more) to
>reduce fragmentation of the IPv6 address space.
>
>To Christian Vogt, my comments did not show up on your
>meeting minutes, which is understandable because you
>were presenting at the time. Maybe update the minutes
>if you get a chance.
>
>Thanks - Fred
>fred.l.templin@boeing.com  
>
>  
>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
>word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg