RE: [RRG] Comments on draft-lewis-lisp-interworking

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

|Maybe I'm naive, but I'd been assuming that EIDs would in practice be
|identically equal to addresses allocated under a registry-allocated
|PI prefix.  So the provider can know about the prefix just like today,
|even if there's no advertisement. I don't see why that would change
|fundamentally, even if the proposed LISP-ALT EID prefix space is used.


It's unfortunate that it wouldn't change, because the provider would need to
know about both the PA allocation and the EID assignment.  Effectively, it's
double the hassle factor.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg