[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RRG] Question about ITR and ETR deployment
- To: rrg@psg.com
- Subject: [RRG] Question about ITR and ETR deployment
- From: "Gang Chen" <phdgang@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:51:47 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Yv1yNQSsUPu5Sqd5EtI6aw3wvHmBTyYnVo/vWnf5PlMtrQbKYHwGVtBh+U4diNrdxbtBaC++VAIqvY8gVv3BtT86hDL8fSCFlU2OJb7931xVSBmpUaQpyroOx+aQqR47nlT5qzS3UK3LS/E7JCRYOu8F8ozZjC7yH0TB7bwFl/Q=
Dear Tony and Lixia:
May I ask you question about ITR and ETR deployment location? In the LISP draft-farinacci-lisp-06.txt, both CE and PE router can be used for tunnel endpionts. I wonder to know where is the optimal location to reduce router table size in DFZ greatly?
Best Regards
Gang Chen
phdgang@gmail.com