re:Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification

[xuxiaohu 41208 <xuxh@huawei.com>]

> 
> What I gathered from the above:
> - a clearly defined set of terminology is critically important
>   (I saw fair number of "ID"s in a pretty short paragraph:-)
> 
> - the terminology definition, in turn, critically depend on reaching
>   agreement on a set of basic concepts.
>   (e.g. is a wireline connectivity a special case of generally 
> mobile  
> world)
> 
> - what falls into the basic concepts depends on the scope of the 
> design   (e.g. the overall Internet architecture, vs. the routing 
> architecture   with a clear understanding of its relations to the 
> other parts)

agree, the first thing we need to do is to define the concept clearly before architecture design,and I believe that the scope of design is the first concept to be defined since it will determine what's the best candidate of id and locator.

Best regards,
Xiaohu Xu


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg