[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification

To: rrg <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:31:43 -0700
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
In-reply-to: <E74B4DD0-EF25-425D-96DE-3A0990339C49@CS.UCLA.EDU>
References: <E74B4DD0-EF25-425D-96DE-3A0990339C49@CS.UCLA.EDU>

% Does the above miss any other branches at the top level design tree?

Fixing naming.

An "8+8" architecture does not necessarily require any address
rewriting.  So one can have architectures that fix the naming issues
without being in a grouping called "address rewriting".

Folks on this list might want to read IEN-1 to see how long ago
some folks understood these are naming issues at their heart.
(IEN-1 is online in PDF these days.)

Cheers,

Ran


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>

References:
- Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification
  - From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Previous by thread: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Next by thread: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread