[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification

To: "'Randall Atkinson'" <rja@extremenetworks.com>, "'rrg'" <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 11:01:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC06C6@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com>
References: <E74B4DD0-EF25-425D-96DE-3A0990339C49@CS.UCLA.EDU> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC06C6@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com>
Reply-to: <tony.li@tony.li>

 
Ran,

|% Does the above miss any other branches at the top level design tree?
|
|Fixing naming.
|
|An "8+8" architecture does not necessarily require any address
|rewriting.  So one can have architectures that fix the naming issues
|without being in a grouping called "address rewriting".


Is this really a different branch?  Don't all solutions "fix" naming for
varying values of "fix"?

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>

References:
- Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification
  - From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
- RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Next by Date: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Previous by thread: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Next by thread: RE: [RRG] RRG process clarification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread