Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification

[xuxiaohu 41208 <xuxh@huawei.com>]

> >
> > |Should the geographically aggregatable address be out of the
> > |consideration?
> > |For example, the site networks will use geographically aggregatable
> > |addresses which are independent of the ISPs. However, these
> > |addresses can be
> > |aggregated in the ISP network even though the transit networks
> > |within some
> > |region are required to be connected directly or indirectly.
> >
> >
> > No, geographically aggregatable addresses are not out of  
> > consideration.
> > However, to seriously propose them, one should also include  
> > solutions to the
> > well known issues with geographic aggregation.  At the very 
> least,  
> > these
> > include the resulting common interconnect within the geographic 
> area  
> > and the
> > effective mandate of the topology.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tony
> 
> well said.
> Xiaohu, please let us know if there is a plan to submit such a 
> proposal.

Hi Lixia,

yes, I plan to submit a upgraded version of the HRA proposal soon. In this version, I hope to embed some geographical information into the locator domain ID and simultaneously define the hierarchical host identifier with embeded organization affiliation by borrowing some idea from CGA.

Best wishes,
Xiaohu Xu


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg