Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space

[Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>]

On May 26, 2008, at 12:36 AM, Tony Li wrote:

> |The point of my argument is that the only possible mechanism is
> |portability.
>
>
> Provably incorrect: many organizations are very happy sitting behind  
> a NAT
> box.  It provides excellent addressing isolation.

hmm, aren't addresses behind a NAT box portable addresses?

Lixia


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg