[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space

To: "'Robin Whittle'" <rw@firstpr.com.au>, "'Routing Research Group'" <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 00:36:32 -0700
Cc: "'Marshall Eubanks'" <tme@multicasttech.com>, "'Randall Atkinson'" <rja@extremenetworks.com>, "'Brian E Carpenter'" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <483A30D0.5020906@firstpr.com.au>
References: <483932D3.6040203@firstpr.com.au> <99E28965-F760-4966-B561-62089B668EFA@multicasttech.com> <573019AFAC1E40A29CF739768C3600F6@ad.redback.com> <483A30D0.5020906@firstpr.com.au>
Reply-to: <tony.li@tony.li>

 

|The point of my argument is that the only possible mechanism is
|portability.


Provably incorrect: many organizations are very happy sitting behind a NAT
box.  It provides excellent addressing isolation.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
  - From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>

References:
- [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
  - From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread